A UK Study of Thinking and Language Expression

cris.lastimport.scopus2024-09-18T01:31:32Z
dc.abstract.enThe study assessed children’s ability to develop narratives and express ideas. It comprised 120 children (5-10 years), and differences in relation to age, sex, and economic area were measured. To this end, we compared four schools in 2 economic areas (poor and average). We used 2 picture and 2 story re-telling tasks designed to elicit narrations reflecting the generation of ideas in response to visual and auditory stimuli. Significant differences for age and sex but not economic areas were found. Suggestions are made for balancing brain activity and developing more creative approaches in teaching and assessment.
dc.affiliationNauk o Człowieku
dc.contributor.authorRosemary J.W.B. Sage
dc.contributor.authorLuke D. Sage
dc.contributor.authorBożydar L.J. Kaczmarek
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-22T09:07:31Z
dc.date.available2024-02-22T09:07:31Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>The study assessed children’s ability to develop narratives and express ideas. It comprised 120 children (5-10 years), and differences in relation to age, sex, and economic area were measured. To this end, we compared four schools in 2 economic areas (poor and average). We used 2 picture and 2 story re-telling tasks designed to elicit narrations reflecting the generation of ideas in response to visual and auditory stimuli. Significant differences for age and sex but not economic areas were found. Suggestions are made for balancing brain activity and developing more creative approaches in teaching and assessment.</jats:p>
dc.identifier.doi10.15804/tner.23.71.1.07
dc.identifier.issn1732-6729
dc.identifier.urihttps://repo.akademiawsei.eu/handle/item/103
dc.languageen
dc.pbn.affiliationpsychology
dc.relation.ispartofThe New Educational Review
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC
dc.subject.enthinking
dc.subject.enlanguage
dc.subject.ennarratives
dc.subject.enassessment
dc.subject.ensolutions
dc.titleA UK Study of Thinking and Language Expression
dc.typeReviewArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.volume71